There are approximately 750 unidentified human remains and 2500 long-term missing persons in Australia. Dr. Ward spent a decade researching international best-practice for implementing a DNA-led identification effort for missing persons investigations, and advocating for a national program to scientifically link Australia’s unknown human remains and known missing persons using centralized and contemporary forensic technologies, databases, and experts. In 2020, she partnered with the Australian Federal Police National Missing Persons Coordination Centre to successfully apply for the federal funding required to establish the National DNA Program for Unidentified and Missing Persons. This multifaceted, multi-stakeholder and multidisciplinary program is assisting Australian law enforcement to solve decades-old cases by using a suite of forensic tools and populating national and international databases. The Program’s capabilities include forensic anthropology, forensic odontology, radiocarbon dating, isotopic analysis, autosomal/Y-chromosome/mitochondrial DNA testing, forensic DNA phenotyping, forensic investigative genetic genealogy, and craniofacial reconstruction. The Program has assisted to identify a number of human remains from historical and contemporary contexts, resolve cases deemed to be of no forensic significance, and provide investigative leads for others. This success has centered on forging collaborative partnerships with police, coronial and intelligence agencies across Australia, national and international forensic experts in government, university and private laboratories, and families of missing loved ones.
You Might Also Like
0:00
[Music]
0:11
Hi, my name is Dr. Jody Ward and I'm the lead of the AFP's National DNA Program
0:16
for Unidentified Missing Persons and I'm delighted to be joining
0:20
HITS 2024 this year to talk about our program objectives
0:25
and the outcomes of the four-year program.
0:28
So the driver for our National DNA Program for Unidentified and Missing Persons
0:33
really came about because I became aware that there were hundreds of
0:37
unidentified human remains in Australia some years ago.
0:41
So I spent a number of years campaigning for the support and funding we needed
0:47
to
0:47
establish a nationally coordinated program like this.
0:51
And then in 2020 I collaborated with the Australian Federal Police National
0:56
Missing Persons Coordination Centre to apply for approximately $3.6 million
1:01
in proceeds of crime funding to establish our program and we awarded that
1:06
funding
1:07
in 2020. So as part of our National DNA Program
1:11
for Unidentified and Missing Persons one of our first aims was to conduct a
1:15
national audit of all of the unidentified and missing persons cases
1:20
in Australia because up until now we really only had an estimate of how many
1:25
we had in this country. So as a result of our audit we were able to
1:30
establish that there were approximately 750 sets of
1:35
unidentified human remains in Australia and two and a half thousand long-term
1:40
missing persons. So this project was going to span cases
1:44
that were found as recently as this year and dating back as far back to the
1:51
40s and the 50s of last century. So the scope of the work was quite large
1:57
in terms of the I guess diversity of remains, how degraded they were,
2:03
how old they were. Also the level of previous forensic
2:08
testing varied greatly. So as part of the audit we were trying to
2:12
establish what level of forensic testing had been conducted
2:16
previously and that was often dependent on the year
2:20
in which the remains were recovered. And then it was an opportunity for us
2:25
to collaborate with the case investigators to establish
2:30
how the program could assist them progress these cases.
2:34
So we had to establish what was left in the case. Did we still have a full
2:39
skeleton available? Did we only have an alacort of DNA sitting in a freezer?
2:46
And then we were able to work with them to establish an individualised
2:51
examination plan, you know, starting sequentially with our
2:55
routine DNA testing methods and then progressing to our more advanced
3:00
methods if that was necessary. So with our program we
3:05
pride ourselves that it's a multi-disciplinary forensic program. We do have
3:09
DNA in the title and it is DNA led in many respects.
3:13
But prior to us investing in any DNA testing
3:17
our remains undergo a number of non-DNA techniques.
3:21
So once we receive a set of remains the first examination that is conducted
3:26
is a forensic anthropology examination and we undertake that to try and
3:30
estimate
3:30
the biological profile of that individual. So sex, age, ancestry and
3:36
stature if we have those skeletal elements available.
3:41
And then we engage a forensic odontologist to conduct a
3:46
dental record examination if there are teeth present in a particular case.
3:52
And once our odontologist has conducted that examination they will upload those
3:57
dental records to our national missing persons and victim system.
4:01
This is our national database that collates all of the case information
4:06
about unidentified missing persons cases and it's our only platform
4:11
for the searching of dental records nationally.
4:14
So we do ask that before we proceed with DNA testing that we ensure that that
4:19
dental record search has been conducted first.
4:24
As I'm sure many of the viewers understand its fingerprints, dental and
4:29
DNA are the three primary identifiers. Unfortunately for the remains that we
4:33
see we don't have fingerprints available so we always ensure that we do our
4:38
dental record checks before proceeding with DNA testing.
4:43
Failing a dental record match is when we will then consider routine DNA testing
4:49
And so for our program routine DNA testing includes
4:54
autosomal STR profiling, y-chromosome STR profiling,
5:00
and whole mitochondrial genome sequencing. We always perform autosomal STR
5:06
testing
5:07
on our set of remains because our national criminal investigation
5:12
DNA database is comprised primarily of STR profiles.
5:16
So we always want to try and generate an STR profile that we can search on our
5:21
national law enforcement database if we can achieve that.
5:25
If we know that we are dealing with a set of mail
5:30
unidentified human remains we will also routinely perform
5:33
y-chromosome STR profiling and that's so we can provide
5:39
the zoot jurisdiction back with two different DNA modalities.
5:43
So we'll have the autosomal and the y-chromosome DNA profile for searching.
5:48
If we have a female unidentified human remains we will also routinely proceed
5:53
with mitochondrial DNA testing. Again so we can provide them
5:57
back both the autosomal STR profile and a complementary mitochondrial
6:02
DNA profile. So we know that for some of our remains they are likely to be
6:08
international citizens which have visited Australia.
6:13
And we're making those assumptions based on a number of
6:16
personal effects and things found with some of the remains.
6:20
So if there's any indication that an individual might have come from overseas
6:24
we are recommending that that DNA profile gets submitted to the
6:27
interpol DNA database for searching internationally before we're
6:32
proceeding with some of our more emerging DNA technologies.
6:36
If all of those primary tools have been exhausted
6:40
and the individual is still unable to be identified
6:43
that's when we can explore our newer technologies that we have validated at
6:48
the AFP. So one of those is forensic DNA phenotyping
6:53
which we use to estimate the unknown individuals
6:57
biogeographical ancestry hair color and eye color.
7:02
And we do that to not only provide investigative leads to help
7:06
the investigator narrow down the list of potential missing persons that it
7:10
could be but we also perform cranial facial
7:14
reconstructions as part of our suite of identification tools.
7:20
So if there is a skull present for some of the remains
7:23
we're able to proceed with the cranial facial reconstruction later in our
7:27
investigation and we can then apply that pigmentation information that we've
7:32
been able to obtain through forensic DNA phenotyping
7:36
to those cranial facial reconstructions to ensure that that reconstructed
7:40
image is as realistic as possible when it's disseminated out into the public.
7:45
The newest technology we've brought online is forensic investigative
7:49
genetic genealogy. Our lab is the only accredited
7:53
forensic lab in the country which is able to perform the
7:56
SNP testing required to generate the profile for upload.
8:00
We typically use forensic investigative genealogy as
8:04
last resort testing and we do that because
8:09
the privacy policy we abide by is this sequential unmasking of genetic
8:14
information. So we use those genetic tools which reveal
8:18
very little about a person and have less privacy
8:23
implications and then we progress sequentially up to the phenotyping
8:29
and the forensic investigative genetic genealogy which is obviously revealing
8:33
a lot more about an individual and can make connections with a lot more
8:36
relatives on public and private genetic genealogy
8:41
databases. So in terms of the legislation in Australia it's actually silent
8:46
on these emerging forensic genomics technologies.
8:50
So we have implemented a number of policies and procedures at the Australian
8:56
federal police which govern how we utilize these new
9:00
forensic genomics tools. So forensic DNA phenotyping and our
9:04
forensic investigative genetic genealogy kind of looked at every point in the
9:09
process as to how we could best reduce any privacy
9:17
impacts to those individuals working with us in the program.
9:22
Also when you think about something like forensic investigative genetic gene
9:25
alogy
9:26
you know we're now dealing with very distant relatives of a missing person
9:31
that wouldn't even know that they have a missing person in their family.
9:35
So in terms of us informing those relatives you know that's very difficult
9:40
for us to do in terms of the risks to participating in our program.
9:46
So one of the recommendations as part of our privacy impact assessment was to
9:52
ensure that we were taking a very transparent approach
9:56
with the DNA tools we'll be using and the DNA databases we were accessing.
10:00
Once we've generated an autosomal STR profile from a set of remains
10:04
it gets uploaded to a state DNA database by the jurisdiction
10:11
and then it gets uploaded to our national criminal investigation DNA
10:15
database and at that point it is searched against
10:20
every DNA profile on that database. So it will be searched against
10:25
crime samples, offender samples and then those unidentified human remains
10:31
DNA profiles get migrated across to a separate section
10:35
of our national database. In that particular section of our database
10:40
we upload DNA profiles from relatives of long-term missing persons.
10:46
So this functionality was created a few years ago
10:52
and this is part of the database is termed our national integrated forensic
10:57
analysis system. So this allows unidentified remains
11:02
profiles to be migrated across after they've been searched against all other
11:06
indices on our national database including against DNA profiles
11:11
from missing persons. So these are direct reference samples
11:15
collected after someone has been reporting missing. So this could be a DNA
11:19
profile from a toothbrush, a razor from a stored biological
11:25
sample of the missing person. This functionality came about a few years
11:30
ago because prior to that our national DNA database only allowed for direct
11:36
searching and matching which was fine if you had a direct reference
11:40
sample from a missing person but for many of our historical cases we
11:43
don't have direct reference samples because of the age
11:48
of the case at all because these samples weren't collected
11:53
historically at the time of someone at the time someone was reported missing.
11:57
So we're now at this point relying on relatives of missing persons to provide
12:02
DNA so we want to assure them that when their DNA is collected that it's
12:06
only being searched against unidentified human remains DNA profiles.
12:12
This new functionality also allowed us to perform
12:15
kinship searching which wasn't available on our national DNA database
12:19
before. So this has been quite groundbreaking in
12:24
Australia because it now means that we can
12:26
nationally search relatives against or unidentified remains in Australia.
12:32
Previous to this this could only happen at a
12:35
jurisdiction by jurisdiction level. So I had huge concerns that were
12:40
actually missing potential matches of unidentified and missing people at a
12:45
national level without having a national kinship
12:48
searching capability and we have seen the results of that as part of our
12:52
program where we are seeing links being made
12:56
at the state level as well as the national level
13:00
using using our kinship searching capability.
13:05
So the national integrated forensic analysis system also now allows us to
13:09
upload Y chromosome STR profiles and mitochondrial
13:14
DNA profiles. So this was also new but as you imagine it's
13:20
been hugely important for missing and unidentified persons investigations.
13:25
Not only does it allow us to refine candidate lists when we are performing
13:31
these familiar or kinship searches but in some cases
13:36
for some of our particularly old and degraded set of remains we might only be
13:41
able to generate a mitochondrial DNA profile.
13:44
So this now allows us the opportunity to search mitochondrial DNA profiles at a
13:49
national level which we haven't been able to do before.
13:52
So our program has received almost 100 unidentified human remains cases
13:59
to date. We've received those from six out of our eight
14:04
state and territory jurisdictions. They have come to us
14:09
for a diversity of forensic testing techniques.
14:14
So some have only come in for DNA testing and some have come in
14:18
right at the start where we've been able to facilitate the forensic
14:22
anthropology and have progressed all the way to forensic
14:25
investigative genetic genealogy. So all of them are
14:29
assessed on a case-by-case basis and then we determine the best
14:33
examination strategy to apply. So far of those approximate 100
14:38
cases we've been able to resolve 50% of them.
14:42
So 50 cases have been resolved. Now what does that mean?
14:47
Well we have been able to link 18 sets of unidentified human remains to 16
14:55
long-term missing persons in Australia.
14:58
The difference in the number is because we've been able to link
15:03
two sets of separate remains as being the one individual.
15:09
So we're extremely proud of being able to restore the identity
15:15
of 16 sets of unidentified human remains as some of our long-term
15:22
missing people. Of those remaining 32 sets of unidentified human remains we've
15:28
been able to triage them as not being a coronal
15:33
significance. So we've been able to reduce the number of what we believe are
15:38
coronaly significant unidentified human remains cases in this country.
15:43
So the first case our program team helped resolve
15:47
was a set of partial remains which washed up on a beach in South
15:53
Australia in 1977. The South Australia police had
15:59
investigated that case over a number of decades but unfortunately
16:03
weren't able to identify that individual. They knew it was likely to be a set
16:09
of male remains, likely an adult, and that was determined
16:14
through the forensic anthropology examination.
16:18
So in 2021 South Australia police submitted a bone sample to our program.
16:25
We were able to recover both an autosomal and a y chromosome
16:29
STR profile. We were then able to return those profiles to the South
16:36
South Strait police investigators and they worked with their local
16:40
forensic laboratory. So they were able to compare the DNA profiles we were able
16:45
to generate from the set of remains to a DNA profile that they had sourced
16:52
from a living family member. Now this person they believed
16:58
was the potential brother of the unidentified human remains
17:04
and they had established this through a renewed police investigation
17:09
over the last couple of years and they based this on the fact that
17:14
this missing person went missing in the locality of where the remains were
17:20
found approximately six months prior to those remains washing up.
17:26
So they were able to find a living relative who was
17:30
who was quite old at this stage who consented to providing a DNA reference
17:35
sample and then the South Australian lab was
17:39
able to perform kinship analysis with the reference sample they had on hand
17:45
and through that process and then through the coronal
17:50
process following that the coronal was satisfied that we had
17:56
used DNA test dentists to identify those remains
18:00
as Mario de la Torre who hadn't been seen since 1976.
18:07
I guess at some point when you're commencing a program like this you have
18:11
this fear that you may not identify a single person.
18:18
So for me personally you know there was huge relief when we were able
18:24
to assist in the identification of our first set of unidentified human
18:30
remains and you know Mario hadn't been seen
18:34
by his family for 40 or 50 years they never knew the fate or
18:41
whereabouts of Mario so to still have living relatives alive
18:47
that were now able to get those answers that they had waited decades for
18:54
for us was it made it all worth it and and that came in 2021
19:00
and the coroner accepted that identification in February 2022
19:03
so you know we we were 18 months into our program by the time we
19:09
obtained our first identification so our program team was also privileged to
19:14
assist the Royal Australian Navy identify our unknown sailor
19:20
so we had an unknown sailor that was recovered
19:25
at the start of 1942 it was believed that this
19:31
soldier had died in November 1941 when a ship of about 645
19:40
Australian sailors was gunned down by a German warship
19:45
it sunk and all 645 men on board had died
19:51
however there was this life raft which floated ashore on Christmas Island
19:56
which is a small island off the coast of western Australia
20:00
with a deceased individual inside and they believed that to be an Australian
20:07
sailor at the time he was buried in an unmarked grave on
20:12
Christmas Island and then in 2006 the Royal Australian
20:17
Navy went and tried to find his grave because they wanted to try and
20:24
identify this particular individual trying to find his grave
20:29
wasn't an easy task in itself they didn't have any records to rely on so
20:35
it was really relying on individuals which were still alive that might have
20:39
had some recollection of where that individual was buried
20:44
so I think after a number of false digs they did recover a set of remains
20:49
they did find a number of artifacts left over from the clothing
20:55
like I think it might have been buttons that gave them some indication they
20:59
were looking at the uniform of an Australian sailor
21:04
and so a team of forensic experts archaeologists and anthropologists
21:10
excavated the grave at that time they tried to
21:16
establish the biological profile of the individual
21:20
in terms of his age, sex, ancestry, stature, the odontologist examined
21:27
his dental work to see if that matched against any dental records that the
21:31
navy had they also took some bone samples for
21:38
isotope testing and DNA testing. Now in 2006 the DNA
21:47
testing techniques available are definitely not as sensitive
21:51
as they are now so they were unable to detect any autosomal or
21:58
y-chromosome DNA but they were able to generate a
22:02
mitochondrial DNA profile. However based on that
22:09
set of evidence that they had they were still unable to identify
22:14
that individual and link them to one of the 645
22:18
men on board. So over the next five years they
22:24
tried to undertake a number of other investigations
22:29
so they had the mitochondrial DNA haplogroup
22:33
so the navy has genealogists that are still trying to build out
22:38
family trees of our sailors to try and see if they could
22:45
you know track some maternal lineages to start testing.
22:49
My colleague associate professor Jeremy Austin at the University of Adelaide
22:54
he was the one that conducted the mitochondrial genome
22:57
testing at the time but he went about performing forensic DNA phenotyping
23:02
to try and determine the genetic ancestry and hair and eye color
23:06
of the sailor and it was determined that the sailor was of European ancestry
23:11
and had red hair and blue eyes which again could have been quite distinctive
23:19
and in 2019 a breakthrough came when associate professor Austin was
23:27
presenting on the unknown sailor case and all the work he had done
23:31
at a genealogy group meeting he was invited along to give this
23:37
presentation and at the time he divulged what the
23:42
mitochondrial DNA haplogroup was and that could have been an
23:47
interesting fact to a group of genealogists
23:50
and so one of them went away and looked into their own family history
23:56
and realised that they were aware of someone
24:01
in their family tree which had this particular mitochondrial DNA haplogroup.
24:06
Now this mitochondrial DNA haplogroup hadn't been seen in any other samples
24:11
that associate professor Austin had tested so you know he
24:15
uploaded it to the MPOP mitochondrial DNA database
24:19
he had tried to test a number of relatives
24:23
of unknown sailors from that from World War II and none of the relatives had
24:31
this particular haplogroup so he felt like he had exhausted
24:34
all options and so armed with that information the genealogists
24:39
working for the navy were able to connect these relatives
24:44
and he was provided with a maternal relative to test
24:50
and they had the matching mitochondrial DNA profile at that point.
24:54
For the Royal Australian navy one modality of DNA testing
24:58
was not enough to move forward to the identification board to confirm that
25:04
identity so we were engaged in 2021 to try and generate
25:11
a Y chromosome STR profile using the Y phyla plus kit that we had brought
25:18
online and our specialised DNA extraction
25:21
technique so we took that sample extracted it
25:25
and we were able to recover you know a partial Y chromosome
25:31
profile but a fairly decent Y chromosome
25:35
STR profile in the meantime the navy had also located
25:40
a living paternal relative of the individual they
25:47
putatively thought thought it was and he lived in Australia so he provided
25:52
a DNA reference sample and then we perform Y chromosome STR
25:57
testing on his sample and then we were able to make
26:01
that Y STR match so armed with the mitochondrial
26:07
and the Y chromosome match you know maternal and paternal relatives from
26:11
either side of the family tree two different DNA
26:14
modalities from two different DNA testing laboratories in Australia
26:20
in conjunction with some other circumstantial evidence that the navy
26:24
obviously also had they put that identification forward to the
26:27
identification board and that was accepted in 2022
26:32
and we were invited along to a lovely ceremony at the stream
26:39
war memorial to commemorate his death and he was then
26:47
identified as able-seaman Thomas Willoughby Clark
26:53
I guess a piece of Australian history in terms of
26:57
being able to not only be able to restore the name of this fallen
27:03
sailor but but for many he represents all 645 men on board
27:11
that died that day so so I think this case just demonstrates
27:18
how far advanced DNA technology has come
27:22
so one of the cases that has impacted me the most is a recent case
27:26
that we have been involved in and in this matter
27:30
a set of remains was located in December 2022
27:36
in the bottom of an apartment block in Brisbane in Queensland
27:42
and it was determined that this individual had been there
27:46
for quite a number of years they were wrapped up in a number of wrappings
27:51
and they were deliberately hidden away from plain sight
27:56
but it wasn't some years until these remains were inadvertently
28:00
discovered now the forensic pathology and anthropology examination determined
28:06
that these remains were likely those of a younger
28:11
female there was some indication that it was
28:16
likely to be a homicide and we were engaged early on in that
28:23
investigation to help the investigators establish as much
28:27
information as they could about the identity of this individual
28:32
so we firstly attempted our routine DNA testing
28:38
methods and we confirmed that the individual was female
28:44
we uploaded her DNA to the Queensland and the national DNA database
28:51
but the jurisdiction saw no DNA matches
28:56
so at that point we spoke with the investigators about what are the
29:01
tools we could employ to provide them with an investigative lead
29:06
so our options at that point were forensic DNA phenotyping
29:13
and then moving forward with the craning or facial reconstruction
29:16
all forensic investigative genetic genealogy
29:20
so this was the second case that we had used our in-house newly validated and
29:29
accredited forensic investigative genetic genealogy tool
29:32
on so we were really excited to employ it as well so
29:39
when we uploaded the DNA we obtained a number of matches
29:46
we engaged a genetic genealogist as part of our program
29:50
and she works with us to perform all of the genealogy research
29:57
so we provide her with the list of matches we
30:00
obtain and then she goes about building out the family trees of those matches
30:07
she was able through her genealogy research
30:13
and now we're in on a particular family group
30:18
that the investigators should be concentrating
30:22
their efforts on so me we met with the investigators and provided
30:27
those investigative leads and at that point
30:32
within a few days of providing those leads
30:36
the investigators had identified a pewter-to-do mother and father
30:42
of our unknown female victim and that was only possible because
30:50
we were collaborating with those investigators in real time across
30:54
those two or three days you know in terms of them
30:59
going and interviewing someone obtaining some new family information
31:04
and then our genealogist you know incorporating that information directly
31:08
into the family tree us narrowing down on a new branch
31:13
and it was amazing to be I guess a part of that investigation in real time
31:19
it was only successful I believe because of that
31:23
collaboration occurring and where we landed with that was
31:30
through their investigations the case investigators
31:33
were able to figure out that the missing person's mother had not seen her
31:45
for a number of years the father had not seen his daughter for a number of
31:50
years
31:51
but his father had actually taken a direct consumer DNA test
31:56
previously unfortunately that DNA was sitting on a DNA database
32:00
that we were not able to use for our genealogy
32:05
research so he consented to copy his DNA across
32:10
to jetmatch and we were able to then see his match to our unidentified
32:18
human remains and by all indications we were able to establish a
32:24
parent-child relationship between those two individuals
32:30
and then the final step in that process was us
32:33
performing the confirmatory DNA testing so because we'd already obtained
32:40
the autosomal STR profile from the set of remains before we embarked on
32:44
forensic
32:44
investigation genealogy both the mother and father provided a
32:48
reference DNA sample that underwent STR testing
32:52
and then the Queensland forensic lab were able to perform
32:56
that kinship analysis between the mother father and the child
33:00
and they were able to confirm that paternity trio
33:04
relationship they also didn't have any other biological children
33:09
and so collectively with all that information
33:12
the coroner accepted that identification
33:17
and so her identity has now been disclosed as
33:22
Tanya Lee Glover she hasn't been seen since 2010
33:29
so my top two recommendations for a country considering establishing
33:35
a national missing persons program is firstly we have seen the value
33:41
in centralizing the capability so having a one-stop shop
33:47
of contemporary forensic techniques databases and experts
33:52
all under the one roof and they are dedicated to the role
33:57
of unidentified and missing persons investigations
34:01
making sure you're leveraging your national databases that you do have
34:05
available you know a database is as only as good as the
34:08
data that's on it so as if I'm ensuring they are populated with all of the
34:12
available anti-mortem and the post-mortem data
34:16
for the most effective and efficient matching
34:20
and my second recommendation would be don't overlook the importance
34:26
of engaging and educating the families and the public
34:32
and doing that through a trauma-informed and culturally
34:36
aware lens because the success of our program was reliant
34:42
on obtaining that anti-mortem information whether it's about what a
34:47
missing person looks like you know their physical
34:51
appearance what was their medical history who was their dentist did they
34:55
have dental records as well as them providing us
35:00
with reference DNA material from whatever close living relatives we had
35:06
available at the time and then you know further than that
35:12
in terms of the general public now that we actually have tools like
35:16
forensic investigative genetic genealogy that actually rely
35:20
on the public sharing you know their genetic information
35:25
with law enforcement for these really specific investigative purposes
35:30
now we're seeing this you know this groundbreaking
35:34
technique resolving cases that we've never been able to resolve
35:39
before so so I think it's a combination of
35:42
the best forensic tools combined with ensuring all of your stakeholders
35:49
are coming on board this journey with you
35:53
I'd like to thank Thermo Fisher Scientific for the invitation to present
35:58
on our national DNA program for unidentified missing persons at HIDS
36:01
2024 we are so proud of the program that we have created here in Australia
36:07
and we really do hope that other countries might be able to learn from
36:11
some of our experiences if anyone has any questions
36:15
please reach out to me and thank you for listening and I hope you enjoy the
36:20
rest of his 24
36:24
[Music]
36:34
the Seac Studio Flex genetic analyzer has an expanded collection range
36:38
which means you can detect peak heights up to 60,000 RFUs before they go off
36:42
scale when you're analyzing a single source sample
36:45
or using a direct amplification workflow homozygous peaks are less likely to be
36:49
off scale with this extended range when used in combination with gene
36:53
mapper IDX version 1.7 which is an approved expert
36:56
system for data basing the first past success rate may increase
37:00
and that means fewer all-scale peaks and the pull up beneath them being called